Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, I guess trying to distill what bugs me, I'd say: it seems to me > that you have ignored what Junio said about taking my series, and then > you rebased my series on top of unrelated stylistic churn, with that > churn containing three issues that trigger ongoing misgivings I have > about the care being put behind these refactorings, especially > considering their value compared to the features and bugfixes we are > getting, and you seem to fail to try to understand my changes and > misrepresent them in the process. I hope I'm not overreacting but > something feels wrong to me here. Just one thing. It is fairly easy to rebase and merge and generally muck with somebody else's changes without fully understanding it. I do that all the time ;-) I would prefer to see us assume misunderstanding by incompetence, rather than misrepresentation by malice to further one's own agenda.
