On Sun, Oct 03 2021, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 10:33:18PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>> Some implementations of wc(1) align their output with leading spaces,
>> even when just a single number is requested, e.g. with "wc -c". p5311
>> runs all tests successfully on such a platform, but fails to aggregate
>> their results and reports:
>
> This makes sense, and makes me think that wc's platform-specific
> implementations are too tricky to use when we are being picky about
> leading spaces.
>
> In other words, I think that your fix is absolutely correct, but I
> wonder if test_size should be friendlier in what it accepts, and to
> chomp off any leading space. So perhaps something like the below would
> work without any modification to p5311.
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> Subject: [PATCH] t/perf/aggregate.perl: tolerate leading spaces
>
> When using `test_size` with `wc -c`, users on certain platforms can run
> into issues when `wc` emits leading space characters in its output,
> which confuses get_times.
>
> Callers could switch to use test_file_size instead of `wc -c` (the
> former never prints leading space characters, so will always work with
> test_size regardless of platform), but this is an easy enough spot to
> miss that we should teach get_times to be more tolerant of the input it
> accepts.
>
> Teach get_times to do just that by stripping any leading space
> characters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> t/perf/aggregate.perl | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/perf/aggregate.perl b/t/perf/aggregate.perl
> index 82c0df4553..575d2000cc 100755
> --- a/t/perf/aggregate.perl
> +++ b/t/perf/aggregate.perl
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ sub get_times {
> my $rt = ((defined $1 ? $1 : 0.0)*60+$2)*60+$3;
> return ($rt, $4, $5);
> # size
> - } elsif ($line =~ /^\d+$/) {
> - return $&;
> + } elsif ($line =~ /^\s*(\d+)$/) {
> + return $1;
> } else {
> die "bad input line: $line";
> }
This approach seems like a bit of plastering over the real problem. It's
fine to use the output of "wc -l" or "wc -c" in the context of the
shell's whitespace handling. That's why in various places we do:
test $(wc -l <$file>) = 1
Or similar, but *don't* put that $() in double-quotes. I.e. we're
relying on the shell's whitespace semantics.
So isn't it better to just pass this through the shell's own handling
before emitting the data, something like this POC:
$ stripspace() { var=$1; echo $@; }; x=$(stripspace " hi" " there "); echo "\"$x\""
"hi there"
Of course fixing it up after that in Perl will work just as well, so I
guess this is just an asthetic preference for having the shell handle
the shell's output issues with what's guaranteed to be shell-portable
solutions... :)
