Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lazyload.h: use an even more generic function pointer than FARPROC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:35 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón  <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Because of the way the function declaration was done in the previous
>> > patch the order of variables that use it had to be adjusted so that
>> > it is the last variable declared, as well.
>>
>> Is it clear to everybody what this paragraph is referring to?  It is
>> not, at least to me.
>
> It is not, and it is no longer needed after the fixup was applied to
> the previous
> patch.

Ah, yes, the previous one's definition is quite awkward because you
had to omit the terminating ';' to use it.

I'll drop the paragraph with "commit --amend".

THanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux