Re: [PATCH 5/5] cbtree.h: define cb_init() in terms of CBTREE_INIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 27.09.21 um 02:39 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
> --- a/cbtree.h
> +++ b/cbtree.h
> @@ -37,11 +37,12 @@ enum cb_next {
>  	CB_BREAK = 1
>  };
>  
> -#define CBTREE_INIT { .root = NULL }
> +#define CBTREE_INIT { 0 }
>  
>  static inline void cb_init(struct cb_tree *t)
>  {
> -	t->root = NULL;
> +	struct cb_tree blank = CBTREE_INIT;

This could be

	static const struct cb_tree blank = CBTREE_INIT;

> +	memcpy(t, &blank, sizeof(*t));

Is
	*t = blank;

not a thing in C?

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux