On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:19 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 24/09/21 11.53, Carlo Arenas wrote: > > no; as Junio explained [1] this omission is intentional while the > > rev-list options that > > got cut to make space are not and are more relevant. > > > > IMHO leaving [<options>] to imply ALL options (that also include diff > > options, for example) is better > > Quoting what you linked: > > > The program works in two majorly different modes. It either takes > > > > * message files that are already proof-read and copy-edited from > > the filesystem and sends them out, or > > > > * format-patch options to generate message files out of the commits > > and send them out without any proofreading. > > I think we need to again modify SYNOPSIS and DESCRIPTIONS to highlight > above fact: Bagas, This is much better; can you SOB and help Thiago import it into his tree so it can be included in the next reroll? Thiago, Let's wait a little while to collect more feedback on patch2 before sending it, though Carlo
