On 9/10/07, Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Joel Becker wrote: > > The suggestions are pretty simple. First, when behavior is > > changed invisibly (as the remote branch stuff was), can we note it in > > the documentation? I don't mean the ChangeLog, I mean the manpage. > > Please, no. I understand where you're coming from with this request, but > think of it from the point of view of non-long-time users (or users who > have been keeping up with the changelog) who want to look up some piece > of information. The last thing they want to have to do is read through a > bunch of irrelevant information related to the behavior of obsolete > versions of git they've never even used. > Something that might be fun on the documentation on git web site is to do something similar to git blame on the docs. Each section (whatever a section turns out to be) would have a "since x.y.z" link on it which you could click and get older versions of the docs for people running older builds. Just a thought. -Govind - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
