"Andrzej Hunt via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Carlo points out that t0000 currently doesn't pass with leak-checking > enabled in: > https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPUEsphMUNYRACmK-nksotP1RrMn09mNGFdEHLLuNEWH4AcU7Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m7e40220195d98aee4be7e8593d30094b88a6ee71 > > Here's a series that I've sat on for a while, which adds some UNLEAK's to > "fix" this situation - see the individual patches for a justification of why > an UNLEAK seems appropriate. It seems that discussion on 1/2 seemed to be heading in an improvement but has petered out? I think the simplest fix in these two patches are worth taking, even if we plan to further improve either by refining the granularity of UNLEAK application or by introducing repo_clear_revisions() as Carlo mentions (which is a preferred way to do this if we can manage it), on top. Thanks.