Re: [PATCH 1/6] t2500: add various tests for nuking untracked files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 18 2021, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:

> +	test_create_repo reset_$1 &&

s/test_create_repo/git init/ these days (also for the rest).

> +		mkdir foo.t &&
> +		echo precious >foo.t/file &&
> +		cp foo.t/file expect &&
> +
> +		test_must_fail git reset --merge work 2>error &&
> +		test_cmp expect foo.t/file &&
> +		grep "Updating.*foo.t.*would lose untracked files" error

The test is ambiguous about whether we complain about foo.t/file, or
foo.t, if there was foo.t{file,file-two} would we complain just once or
twice?

I think it's just the directory, but probably worthwhile for the test to
make the distinction. If it's a "a/sub/dir/file" do we complain about
"a/" or "a/sub/dir/" ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux