On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 09:20:38AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > If we came up with some call about what we want subcommands in general > to look like I'd think it would be fine to convert multi-pack-index to > it, perhaps with some deprecation period where it would issue a > warning() while it understood both forms. I'm not sure about what to do with the multi-pack-index command. Probably going through a deprecation process makes the most sense if we do want to get rid of the top-level `--[no-]progress` there, too. But let's have the discussion elsewhere and not buried in the MIDX bitmaps thread ;). > This is a good change, but if you're up for bonus points leaves the docs > in an odd where we (as noted in [1]) document the --object-dir and > --progress options under OPTIONS, but now only take the former before > the sub-command. Thanks for noticing. I got up and did something in between writing and sending this patch, and had a nagging feeling of forgetting something before I sent. But I couldn't figure out what ;). I'll resubmit this patch (with the doc changes squashed in) as a new thread on the list so we can have the discussion not buried in another thread. Thanks, Taylor
