On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:56:00AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > The suggestion I had offhand was just meant as an offhand "interesting, > maybe easier like...", i.e. if you found it easier to split on \t, or > check the hash size in the loop or whatever. :-). You did say "Just an idea", but I treated your suggestion as if you were concerned about being able to extend the format in the future. > I agree that this doesn't matter and should just be left to whatever > you've got a taste for, thanks. This thread became more of a digression > than I thought... I think that all of the discussion was reasonable if I understood your original opinion more clearly ;). It may help (me, at least) to say more explicitly, "This may be easier like [...] but I don't have any concerns about functionality" or similar. Thanks, Taylor
