On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 06:09:45PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:37:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > +test_expect_success 'ignore very large set of prefixes' '
> > + # generate a large number of ref-prefixes that we expect
> > + # to match nothing; the value here exceeds MAX_ALLOWED_PREFIXES
> > + # from ls-refs.c.
> > + {
> > + echo command=ls-refs &&
> > + echo object-format=$(test_oid algo)
> > + echo 0001 &&
> > + perl -le "print \"refs/heads/$_\" for (1..65536+1)" &&
> > + echo 0000
> > + } |
> > + test-tool pkt-line pack >in &&
>
> Yuck. While double-checking some refactoring, I realized this test does
> not actually generate the correct input!
>
> It omits the "ref-prefix" header. _And_ it accidentally expands $_ in
> the shell rather than in perl.
Hah, nice find. You'd think that one of us would have caught it earlier
given that we both discussed it.
Thanks,
Taylor
