On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:37:21AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > This isn't really hurting anything, but the request does violate the > spec. Let's tighten it up to prevent any surprising behavior. Yeah. I seriously doubt that anybody is relying on this obviously broken behavior, and it's definitely a spec violation. So I have no trouble rejecting 'command=ls-refs=foo' over the wire. Thanks, Taylor
