Re: [PATCH 4/4] t5326: test propagating hashcache values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Alas, there they are. They are basically no different than having the
> name-hash for single pack bitmaps, it's just now we don't throw them
> away when generating a MIDX bitmap from a state where the repository
> already has a single-pack bitmap.

I actually wasn't expecting any CPU/time difference.

I hope that we are talking about the same name-hash, which is used
to sort the blobs so that when pack-objects try to find a good delta
base, the blobs from the same path will sit close to each other and
hopefully fit in the pack window.

The effect I was hoping to see by not discarding the information was
that we find better delta base hence smaller deltas in the resulting
packfiles.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux