On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:25 PM Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:05:05PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > Before calling string_list_clear(). I.e. we didn't strdup(), but during > > free() we pretend that we did, because we did, just not in > > string_list_append(). > > Good catch. It's kind of gross, but the result is: > > static void read_packs_from_stdin(struct string_list *to) > { > - struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT_NODUP; > while (strbuf_getline(&buf, stdin) != EOF) { > string_list_append(to, strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL)); > } > @@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static int cmd_multi_pack_index_write(int argc, const char **argv) > ret = write_midx_file_only(opts.object_dir, &packs, > opts.preferred_pack, opts.flags); > > + /* > + * pretend strings are duplicated to free the memory allocated > + * by read_packs_from_stdin() > + */ > + packs.strdup_strings = 1; > string_list_clear(&packs, 0); An alternative is to do this: struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; ... while (...) { string_list_append_nodup(to, strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL)); ... } ... string_list_clear(&packs, 0); That is, use string_list_append_nodup(), which is documented as existing precisely for this sort of use-case: Like string_list_append(), except string is never copied. When list->strdup_strings is set, this function can be used to hand ownership of a malloc()ed string to list without making an extra copy. (I mention this only for completeness but don't care strongly which approach is used.)