Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > In each of these three, I wasn't able to decide if you wanted these > addressed in a newer version of this series, or if you were happy enough > with the result to pick it up. I'm happy to send you a new version, but > don't want to clog your inbox if you were already planning on picking > this up. Well, it is often a no-cost operation to replace a topic that has been in 'seen' with a newer round, so you do not have to worry about my inbox. As I often say, if it turns out to be a bad idea, I can just drop it from 'seen' as if I didn't see it ;-) Anyway. If a newer version will come, I'd love to see the review comments at least considered (be it from me or from anybody else) --- after all, if the original were good enough, reviewer(s) wouldn't have raised them as potential issues. Of course, "considered" is the key word. No need to blindly follow; as long as there is a solid reason to justify why changing would be worsening the well-written original. Thanks.
