Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > We fsync() the file descriptors we're writing out for all the > auxiliary files, but we don't yet fsync() the file descriptor for > the containing directory. Therefore our data might have been written > out, but it's anyone's guess what the state of the directory > containing the file is after we write the *.idx. > > In practice modern OS's are known to be forgiving on that point, so > this will probably solve races in practice for most users. It will > almost certainly make them better than they were before when we > didn't write *.idx files last. We should more generally improve our > use of fsync() to cover containing directories, but that'll > hopefully be addressed by some follow-up series. I'd probably drop the last paragraph, and replace it with a single sentence "we may want to fsync the containing directory once after placing *.idx file in place, but it is outside of the scope of this series", if I were doing this series. Other than that (and I made a few comments on other patches), these were pleasant read. Thanks.
