Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Sparse index: delete ignored files outside sparse cone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/8/2021 2:56 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Updates in V5
>>> =============
>>>
>>>  * Updated the locality of a cache_entry pointer.
>>>
>>>  * Rephrased a comment.
>>>
>>>  * Removed the patch adding a config option.
>>>
>>>  * I tried, but failed, to create a scenario where the call to
>>>    cache_tree_update() causes a test to fail. I still think this is valuable
>>>    as defensive programming for the reasons mentioned in the patch, which is
>>>    why I didn't remove them here.
>>
>> OK.  
>>
>> The 'sg/test-split-index-fix' topic that has been queued in 'seen'
>> textually depended on the earlier iteration of this topic, so I'll
>> discard it while replacing this topic.
> 
> I rebased the dependent topic myself, but I would not be surprised
> if I weren't careful enough and introduced a new bug.  Please double
> check when a new 'seen' is pushed out in several hours.

Did you have any conflicts? I don't think this version changed any
of the textual dependencies. Anyway, the test suite passes with
GIT_TEST_SPARSE_INDEX=1 on my machine at 'seen' (except for an issue
with t7900-maintenance.sh that is unrelated).

Thanks,
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux