On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:35:10PM -0700, Carlo Arenas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:10 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + if (!(flags & WRITE_REV) && !(flags & WRITE_REV_VERIFY)) > > + return NULL; > > I see this expression matches exactly the logic from 8ef50d9958 which > is why I presume > you used it, but the simpler (and logically equivalent[1]) : > > if !((flags & WRITE_REV) || (flags & WRITE_REV_VERIFY)) Even simpler would be: if (!(flags & (WRITE_REV | WRITE_REV_VERIFY))) although with optimization flags other than -O0, it seems that each of these three produce the same result [1], so I don't think that it matters much either way ;-). Thanks, Taylor [1]: https://godbolt.org/z/fxxhzEz79