Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Can't we store this info on the side between these two static functions > somehow, instead of adding this "wraps" to all commit structs? > Thanks very much and I have some doubts. > ... instead of adding this "wraps" to all commit structs? I think "adding this "wraps" to all commit struct" is an easy but a little rough indeed. I didn't know if this is okay at the time. So I pushed the patch, hoping to ask some different opinions. > Can't we store this info on the side between these two static functions... Do you mean to use static storage to share the "wraps", or other way? I want to make sure that I understand your opinion accurately. Thank you.
