Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm comfortable with saying what's written in the documentation, since > even though it happens to work today, we should leave ourselves open to > not supporting directories which aren't alternates. > > But I'm equally OK if you would rather drop this hunk from the > documentation when staging. Oh, no, don't get me wrong. I am comfortable with the documented limitation, as that is what the area experts have agreed that is reasonable given the expected use case. I however am much less comfortable with a documented limitation that we make no attempt to enforce, and that is why the first thing I looked for after seeing the documentation update was new code to make sure we reject a random directory that is not our alternate object store. Thanks.
