Re: [PATCH v4 05/25] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:33:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not see the reasoning behind "should not be a blocker" from
> Derrick substantiated.  What's the reason why that raw object store
> cannot come from an existing repository, and what's the benefit we
> get from not having to have a repository there?

I also didn't find the reasoning spelled out in his response, but I have
definitely had off-list discussions with Stolee where it was important to
be able to pass a value to `--object-dir` which does *not* belong to a
Git repository (but is used as a dumping ground for packs, a MIDX, and
loose objects).

It may be worthwhile to recapitulate that discussion here on the list.
(I'm hoping that Stolee won't mind filling in the details, since I seem
to have forgotten most of them).

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux