On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 8:01 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The use of the __FUNCTION__ macro is non-standard, in this case all > we're doing with it is generating a prettier unique filename based on > the name of the function that makes it, presumably to make ad-hoc > debugging easier. .. > It's smaller because it punts on the whole notion of adding the > function name to the filename, as argued above I think __LINE__ should > be sufficient here (and is probably already overkill). The only reason > to add __FUNCTION__ or __LINE__ to the filename is presumably for > one-off ad-hoc debugging. It's there so it's easy to track down which tests forget to cleanup after they run, and __LINE__ works for this as well. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
