Hi Junio, On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > writes: > > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > --- > > whats-cooking: fix a couple of typos > > > > I noticed a couple of typos while reading the most recent "What's > > cooking" mail. > > Thanks. > > https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=codepath,code%20path > makes it clear that "code path" is how the phrase is typically > written, but we have 233 instances of 'codepath' in our tree vs only > 39 of 'code path', according to "git grep" X-<. Right. Where coding style is concerned, I prefer to go by what I find in Git's source code, if only to avoid disrupting readers unnecessarily. However, when it comes to English grammar and customs, I am fully aware that many contributors aren't native speakers. Myself included. Therefore, I trust spell checkers more than our source code on those matters (except when it comes to those Git-isms like "submodule", "reftable", or "superproject"). If you feel strongly, please feel free to drop everything except the "submoudle" -> "submodule" fix. Ciao, Dscho
