On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 03:48:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: [snip] > A better way to handle a situation like this is to limit your > dependencies more explicitly. If you look at what I did to the last > round of this topic, you'll see that there is a merge of the > 'ps/connectivity-optim' topic into v2.33 followed by application of > the patches, like this: I wasn't quite sure how to best handle this, but I'll keep this in mind for future iterations/patch series. Thanks for the explanation. [snip] > I had to adjust [4/7] while applying them on top of the same > 3628199d4d I created for queuing the previous round, and it would be > appreciated if you can double-check the result. The result looks good to me, thanks. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
