Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If we're looking for things to clean up, I do like the conversion to the > parse-options API instead of reading argv ourselves, but probably > otherwise prefer the code as-is instead of split across many files. > > But I may be in the minority, and there may be others who do find the > split-up version easier to grok. FWIW, you're not alone. I too like the use of parse_options, but I fail to be enthused by changes to churn the test helper binary.
