Re: [PATCH] HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and FETCH_HEAD are really special.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:39:43PM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I'd have added though that maybe update-ref should print a warning for
> > the references that do not match the restriction Junio added. This could
> > be done using the function Junio proposed un update_ref() in refs.c
> 
> I would even suggest making it into an error, even if we do not
> error out on the reading side (being liberal when reading but
> more strict when creating, that is).
> 
> That confused_ref() needs to be tightened further, by the way.
> It is called only when we are considering to tack the user
> string immediately below $GIT_DIR/ so the only valid cases are
> (1) the string begins with "refs/", or (2) the string is all
> uppercase (or underscore), especially without slash.  The one in
> the proposed patch is not strict enough and does not enforce the
> former.

  I reckon I didn't checked what the function did in detail, just the
code layout :) And I agree an error is event better, I just don't have
enough knowledge of the scripts that used refs in git for a long time
that such a change could break. I mean, I only use git since the 1.2
(maybe even 1.3) series :)

  I'm always all for refusing dangerous layouts rather than trying too
hard to support cumbersome things that are 99% of the times issues :)

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpmESa3KgZxa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux