Re: [PATCH 1/6] t1092: use ORT merge strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:42 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >     It seems to me that it would let us live in the future in a more
> >     comprehensive way if we tweaked merge_recursive() and/or
> >     merge_recursive_generic() so that all internal callers, not just
> >     builtin/merge.c, would redirect to the ort machinery when say
> >     GIT_TEST_REPLACE_RECURSIVE_WITH_ORT environment exists, and
> >     doing it that way we do not need to sprinkle "-srecursive" and
> >     "-sort" everywhere in our tests at randomly chosen places to
> >     give test coverage to both strategies.

GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM already does this; the testsuite already had
`-s recursive` sprinkled everywhere (due to contrast with `-s
resolve`), but since I wanted to use all existing recursive tests as
ort tests, then rather than tweaking all the test files and copying
tests and whatnot, we decided to just have GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM
reinterpret "recursive" to whatever GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM says.

> I could also change this patch to stop using ORT _all the time_ and
> instead let the GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM decide which is tested.
>
> That is, except for the final tests that check that the index is not
> expanded. Those tests must specify the ORT strategy explicitly.
>
> I think I started playing with the GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM because
> it appears to override the command-line option, but I will need to
> double-check that.

Yes, GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort reinterprets "recursive" to mean "ort".



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux