On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Martin Koegler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:48:06AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Also how would this interact with the LRU
> > > delta base window we discussed a week or two ago?
> >
> > This is completely orthogonal.
>
> Maybe we should adjust the split point of the the object list so, that
> objects with the same name hash are processed by one thread, as the LRU
> could provide the most benefit for these objects.
>
> I think of something like (totally untested):
> for (i = 0; i < NR_THREADS; i++) {
> unsigned sublist_size = list_size / (NR_THREADS - i);
> + while (sublist_size < list_size && list[0]->hash == list[1]->hash)
> + sublist_size++;
I guess you mean list[sublist_size-1]->hash == list[sublist_size]->hash.
But yeah that is a good idea.
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
