Re: Bug: Segmentation fault in git diff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Đoàn Trần Công Danh  <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This diff could fix the issue, and the test suite still passes:
>
> ---- 8< ----
>
> diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
> index f9eadc4fc1..8f303958dd 100644
> --- a/diff-lib.c
> +++ b/diff-lib.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int run_diff_files(struct rev_info *revs, unsigned int option)
>  			 * from the desired stage.
>  			 */
>  			pair = diff_unmerge(&revs->diffopt, ce->name);
> -			if (wt_mode)
> +			if (pair && wt_mode)
>  				pair->two->mode = wt_mode;
>  			if (ce_stage(ce) != diff_unmerged_stage)
>  				continue;
> ---- >8 -----

Looks sensible.  

The bug is the result of a bad interaction between cd676a51 (diff
--relative: output paths as relative to the current subdirectory,
2008-02-12) that decided to return NULL from diff_unmerge for an
irrelevant path outside the --relative area, and 095ce953
(diff-files: show unmerged entries correctly, 2011-04-22) that
assumed diff_unmerge() would always yield a usable unmerged pair.

As the NULL pair would never be added to the diff_queue(), when the
big loop around this area of code finishes and hands the processing
off to diffcore_std(), the mode futzing the original code was
attempting to do would have affected absolutely nothing, so I do not
think there would be any subtle breakage coming from this fix.

When you submit an "git am"-able patch, please have my Acked-by.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux