Erez Zadok <ezk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Our group maintains Unionfs on the latest -rc kernel, but we also maintain
> several backports going all the way to 2.6.9. Once we complete the
> development and testing of a feature/fix in -latest, we cherry-pick those
> commits to older backports, and test those. When I cherry-pick from -latest
> to my 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18} repositories, it works reasonably fast. But when
> I cherry-pick to my 2.6.9 tree, it runs about 20 times slower! Why? Is
> there anything I can do to inspect what's going on and perhaps speed up the
> cherry-picking process?
I'm guessing its due to rename detection.
git-cherry-pick is implemented in terms of git-merge-recursive,
which always does rename detection when files are deleted or added.
This can take some considerable time if there's a lot of files that
have been added/deleted.
What would probably be faster would be to dump the patches in
question using git-format-patch and then apply them using git-am.
This bypasses the rename detection as it is using strictly a diff
and an apply.
--
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
