Re: [PATCH] apply: keep buffer/size pair in sync when parsing binary hunks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:24 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
> index 44bc31d6eb..4ed4b27169 100644
> --- a/apply.c
> +++ b/apply.c
> @@ -1917,6 +1917,7 @@ static struct fragment *parse_binary_hunk(struct apply_state *state,
>
>         state->linenr++;
>         buffer += llen;
> +       size -= llen;
>         while (1) {

Ironically, I was looking at this code because of your previous
patch[1] that you suggested was ugly
and because I was going to suggest moving from a for to a while loop
to avoid the overly long line.

It is interesting to note though, that having a for (and obviously
removing the last 2 lines from the loop) with a comma separated
increment instead would
have made this issue IMHO more obvious, and also why I decided against
that; would it be a good idea to fix that as well?

  for (; ; buffer += llen, size -= llen) {

Carlo

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/YRGwjgAIyLPb7g50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux