Re: [PATCH 0/1] blame: Skip missing ignore-revs file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Noah Pendleton <noah.pendleton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Very good point about no longer catching misconfiguration. For
> detecting provenance of a setting, I think we'd need to tag the config
> options with it when they're loaded, possibly in 'struct
> config_set_element' or similar. What do you think about instead
> emitting a warning message on stderr in the case of misconfiguration,
> but still continuing? Eg:

Unconditionally continuing with just a warning would not be a good
approach for at least two reasons.  (1) the user may truly have
intended that ignoreRevsFile to be optional, in which case the
warning is a nuisance that does not add any value, and (2) it truly
may be a misconfiguration that the named file did not exist, but the
output from "git blame" will wipe the display and the warning would
very well go unnoticed (or more likely the user may notice that
there was a warning, but it will go away before the user has a
chance to really read it, which is a lot worse and frustrating
experience).

I think an easier way out is to introduce a new configuration
variable blame.ignoreRevsFileIsOptional which takes a boolean value,
and when it is set to true, silently ignore when the named file does
not exist without any warning.  When the variable is set to false
(or the variable does not exist), we can keep the current behaviour
of noticing a misconfigured blame.ignoreRevsFile and error out.

That way, the current users who rely on the typo detection feature
can keep relying on it, and those who want to make it optional can
do so without getting annoyed by a warning.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux