Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] revision: separate walk and unsorted flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> The `--no-walk` flag supports two modes: either it sorts the revisions
> given as input input or it doesn't. This is reflected in a single
> `no_walk` flag, which reflects one of the three states "walk", "don't
> walk but without sorting" and "don't walk but with sorting".
>
> Split up the flag into two separate bits, one indicating whether we
> should walk or not and one indicating whether the input should be sorted
> or not. This will allow us to more easily introduce a new flag
> `--unsorted-input`, which only impacts the sorting bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/log.c    | 2 +-
>  builtin/revert.c | 3 ++-
>  revision.c       | 9 +++++----
>  revision.h       | 7 ++-----
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Every line of changes in the patch is very satisfying ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux