Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
> index 3860a0d847..a81d5cebc0 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@ -864,6 +864,48 @@ static int fill_commit_in_graph(struct repository *r,
> return 1;
> }
Describe return-value here. 0 for not-found, !0 for found?
> +static int find_object_id_in_graph(const struct object_id *id, struct commit_graph *g, uint32_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct commit_graph *cur_g = g;
> + uint32_t lex_index;
> +
> + while (cur_g && !bsearch_graph(cur_g, (struct object_id *)id, &lex_index))
> + cur_g = cur_g->base_graph;
> +
> + if (cur_g) {
> + *pos = lex_index + cur_g->num_commits_in_base;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Likewise, or as this is public, perhaps in commit-graph.h next to
its declaration.
> +int find_object_in_graph(struct repository *repo, struct object *object)
> +{
> + struct commit *commit;
> + uint32_t pos;
> +
> + if (object->parsed) {
> + if (object->type != OBJ_COMMIT)
> + return -1;
> + return 0;
This is puzzling---at least it is not consistent with what the
function name says ("please say if you find _this_ object in the
commit-graph file"---if that is not what this function does, it
needs a comment before the implementation).
The caller had object and we has already been parsed. If the
function were "with help from commit-graph, please tell me if you
can positively say this is a commit", the above is understandable.
If we know positively that it is not commit, we say "no, it is not a
commit" (which may be suboptimal---if the caller falls back to
another codepath, the object will still not be a commit) and if we
know it is a commit, we can say "yes, it definitely is a commit" and
the caller can stop there.
I guess my only problem with this function is that its name and what
it does does not align. If the caller uses it for the real purpose
of the function I guessed, then the logic itself may be OK.
> + }
> +
> + if (!repo->objects->commit_graph)
> + return -1;
There is no commit-graph, then we decline to make a decision, which
makes sense.
> + if (!find_object_id_in_graph(&object->oid, repo->objects->commit_graph, &pos))
> + return -1;
If it does not exist in the graph, we cannot tell, either.
> + commit = object_as_type(object, OBJ_COMMIT, 1);
> + if (!commit)
> + return -1;
> + if (!fill_commit_in_graph(repo, commit, repo->objects->commit_graph, pos))
> + return -1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int find_commit_in_graph(struct commit *item, struct commit_graph *g, uint32_t *pos)
> {
> uint32_t graph_pos = commit_graph_position(item);
> @@ -871,18 +913,7 @@ static int find_commit_in_graph(struct commit *item, struct commit_graph *g, uin
> *pos = graph_pos;
> return 1;
> } else {
> - struct commit_graph *cur_g = g;
> - uint32_t lex_index;
> -
> - while (cur_g && !bsearch_graph(cur_g, &(item->object.oid), &lex_index))
> - cur_g = cur_g->base_graph;
> -
> - if (cur_g) {
> - *pos = lex_index + cur_g->num_commits_in_base;
> - return 1;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + return find_object_id_in_graph(&item->object.oid, g, pos);
And I think this one is a op-op refactoring that does not change the
behaviour of find_commit_in_graph()? It might be easier if done in
a separate preparatory step, but it is small enough.
> diff --git a/commit-graph.h b/commit-graph.h
> index 96c24fb577..f373fab4c0 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.h
> +++ b/commit-graph.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ int write_commit_graph(struct object_directory *odb,
> enum commit_graph_write_flags flags,
> const struct commit_graph_opts *opts);
>
> +int find_object_in_graph(struct repository *repo, struct object *object);
> +
> #define COMMIT_GRAPH_VERIFY_SHALLOW (1 << 0)
>
> int verify_commit_graph(struct repository *r, struct commit_graph *g, int flags);
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 671b6d6513..c3f9cf2998 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -362,10 +362,12 @@ static struct object *get_reference(struct rev_info *revs, const char *name,
> struct object *object = lookup_unknown_object(revs->repo, oid);
>
> if (object->type == OBJ_NONE) {
> - int type = oid_object_info(revs->repo, oid, NULL);
> - if (type < 0 || !object_as_type(object, type, 1)) {
> - object = NULL;
> - goto out;
> + if (find_object_in_graph(revs->repo, object) < 0) {
> + int type = oid_object_info(revs->repo, oid, NULL);
> + if (type < 0 || !object_as_type(object, type, 1)) {
> + object = NULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> }
