Re: [GSoC] My Git Dev Blog – Week 11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM Atharva Raykar <raykar.ath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Here it is:
https://atharvaraykar.me/gitnotes/week11

Great, thanks!

> Preview:
>
> - Project progress: where I discuss a rough plan for making > ’git
> submodule’ a
>   true builtin.

So your plan is the following:

  - Rename git-submodule.sh to git-submodule-legacy.sh.
- Create builtin/submodule.c, that will read from a config switch called ‘submodule.useBuiltin’. If this is set to false, just call the
legacy shell script, else use the builtin versions.
  - Copy the functions from builtin/submodule--helper.c to
builtin/submodule.c one by one. Make necessary changes in the flag
parsing.
- Once all the functions have been successfully copied, make the
default value of submodule.useBuiltin to true.
  - …eventually remove submodule--helper.c and the shell script
entirely, and deprecate the ‘submodule.useBuiltin’ option.

I wonder though how in the tests you are going to check both the new builtin submodule and the old git-submodule.sh? Do you plan to run the tests twice (once with submodule.useBuiltin set to true, and once with
it set to false)?

Yeah, that is what I thought of doing--first test only the component that was ported with the configuration set to true, and then test the
whole thing with the configuration set to false. It does slightly
complicate things more than I'd like, but I cannot think of a better
way.

From what I could discern from the older threads and other similar
efforts, this was how it was done.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux