Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes:
Git is cheating a bit though. Its primary audience was (and is) the
various integrators working on the Linux kernel, all of whom are fairly
competent C programmers.
Do we still have a huge overlap with the kernel people? I had
an impression that patches from the kernel folks, with notable
exception from a handful (you know who you are), have petered
out rapidly after the first several weeks.
True, but the point I was trying to make is that because git is written
in C, for an audience who are extremely at home with that particular
language, it quickly attracted contributors.
git log --pretty=short | sed -n 's/^Author: \([^<]*\)<.*$/\1/p' | \
sort | uniq | wc -l
reports 355 unique lines, although some authors are mentioned twice
(Theodore Tso vs Theodore Ts'o). Cross-matching the kernel authors
with the git authors shows that git and linux have 111 developers
in common, again reporting some of them twice. A quick visual scan
shows the figure to be 106, assuming no two authors have the same
name (including email addresses produced more unique contributors as
people change email more often than they change name).
It's not unreasonable to say that git got at least 106 C-programmers
"for free" included in their userbase round about the same second
Linus went public with his intentions of managing the linux kernel
in git, all of which are obviously comfortable enough with C to
poke around in the kernel.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
