On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:07 PM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> index 91e30d6ec22..a3c01d588d8 100755
> --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
> git add . &&
> git commit -m "file to dir" &&
>
> + for side in left right
> + do
> + git checkout -b merge-$side base &&
> + echo $side >>deep/deeper2/a &&
> + echo $side >>folder1/a &&
> + echo $side >>folder2/a &&
> + git add . &&
> + git commit -m "$side" || return 1
Why is this "|| return 1" here?
It looks like there are a number of other cases of this in the file
too, which I must have overlooked previously, because I don't
understand any of them.
> + done &&
> +
> git checkout -b deepest base &&
> echo "updated deepest" >deep/deeper1/deepest/a &&
> git commit -a -m "update deepest" &&
> @@ -482,6 +492,33 @@ test_expect_success 'merge' '
> test_all_match git rev-parse HEAD^{tree}
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'merge with conflict outside cone' '
> + init_repos &&
> +
> + test_all_match git checkout -b merge-tip merge-left &&
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> + test_all_match test_must_fail git merge -m merge merge-right &&
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> +
> + # resolve the conflict in different ways:
> + # 1. revert to the base
> + test_all_match git checkout base -- deep/deeper2/a &&
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> +
> + # 2. add the file with conflict markers
> + test_all_match git add folder1/a &&
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> +
> + # 3. rename the file to another sparse filename
But...that doesn't resolve the conflict. Shouldn't this be titled
"accept the conflict & rename the file elsewhere"?
> + run_on_all mv folder2/a folder2/z &&
> + test_all_match git add folder2 &&
'mv' rather than 'git mv', then followed by 'git add'? Any reason for
this order rather than git add followed by git mv?
Also, if you really do want to move first, did you use mv instead of
"git mv" due to the latter's shortcoming of only operating on stage 0?
(https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGJdwpwhQUp4Wa4bKBp4hQFB9OM3N1FXH7SzY0mvLDa7Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/)
Regardless of order, though, I still think mv or add should require a
--force to rename or add a file outside the sparsity paths given the
deferred negative surprises for users around such files. (Or come up
with a solid way to remove those surprises.)
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> +
> + test_all_match git merge --continue &&
> + test_all_match git status --porcelain=v2 &&
> + test_all_match git rev-parse HEAD^{tree}
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success 'merge with outside renames' '
> init_repos &&
