Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> This patch does not add invocation of the "auto repacking".  It
>>> is left to key Porcelain commands that could produce tons of
>>> loose objects to add a call to "git gc --auto" after they are
>>> done their work.  Obvious candidates are:
>>> 
>>> 	git add
>>
>> Nope!  'git add' creates loose objects which are not yet reachable from 
>> anywhere.  They won't get repacked until a commit is made.
>
> Bzzt, I am releaved to see you are sometimes wrong ;-)
>
> They are reachable from the index and are not subject to
> pruning.

Hm.  Isn't it possible to work with several index files at once?  I
seem to remember that even git-add does this itself.  So what is it
that protects objects in such a temporary index from being garbage
collected by a different git process running on the same repository?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux