Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I guess another easy alternative would be to issue a warning() in this > case, which is a relatively light refactoring of passing an error > message up from the relevant function(s) instead of having it die() > directly. I think the end users deserve a warning even when they are running ls-remote or bugreport in such a corrupt repository-lookalike. It might be sufficient to make "git diff [--no-index]" safe enough. Thanks.
