Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This obviously breaks the latest round of reftable topic, as it > still wants this type to take const oid, and I do not think using > on-filesystem lock as if we are using the files backend is not a > good solution. Sorry for redundant negation. "I do not think it is a good solution to have everybody pretend as if they are files backend when they lock refs." was what I meant.
