Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] bundle doc: elaborate on rev<->ref restriction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/07/2021 21:19, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> +Revisions must accompanied by reference names to be packaged in a
>> +bundle, since the header of the bundle is in a format similar to 'git
>> +show-ref'.
> This may be an improvement in the way how the description refers to
> "show-ref", but we do not have to say anything about "show-ref" ;-)
>
> The reason we should give readers why they must give refs while
> creating a bundle, I think, is because the only way to access the
> contents of the bundle is to fetch refs from it, and the refs given
> to the command when the bundle was created becomes the refs that can
> be fetched from the bundle.
>
> Thanks.
>
Should the `list-heads` option be mentioned for investigating existing
bundles?
--
Philip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux