Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Change redundant uses of ":" on the LHS of a ">" to the more commonly While the changes are correct, I am not sure if the adjective "redundant" would apply. The word refers to uses of two or more when one would suffice, but in this case, you use one explicit no-op command ":" when you need zero. > use ">file" pattern. "use" -> "used". > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh b/t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh > index f4c383cd5ce..c9323a08fe8 100755 > --- a/t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh > +++ b/t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh > @@ -54,14 +54,14 @@ test_expect_success 'bundle --stdin <rev-list options>' ' > ' > > test_expect_success 'empty bundle file is rejected' ' > - : >empty-bundle && > + >empty-bundle && > test_must_fail git fetch empty-bundle > ' > > # This triggers a bug in older versions where the resulting line (with > # --pretty=oneline) was longer than a 1024-char buffer. > test_expect_success 'ridiculously long subject in boundary' ' > - : >file4 && > + >file4 && > test_tick && > git add file4 && > printf "%01200d\n" 0 | git commit -F - && > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ test_expect_success 'ridiculously long subject in boundary' ' > ' > > test_expect_success 'prerequisites with an empty commit message' ' > - : >file1 && > + >file1 && > git add file1 && > test_tick && > git commit --allow-empty-message -m "" &&
