Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 04:33:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:35:36AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:07:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > [snip] > >> > > * ps/perf-with-separate-output-directory (2021-07-02) 1 commit > >> > > - perf: fix when running with TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY > >> > > > >> > > Test update. > >> > > > >> > > What's the status of this one? > >> > > >> > From my point of view this is ready, but it's still missing reviews so > >> > far. The lack of interest seems to indicate that nobody has hit the > >> > issue so far, and I wonder why that is. Am I the only one who sets > >> > TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY to a tmpfs directory in his config.mak to speed up > >> > tests? > >> > >> I had marked it to look at, but just hadn't gotten around to it. I just > >> gave it a review (but the upshot is that it looks fine to me). > >> > >> I don't set TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY myself; instead I do: > >> > >> GIT_TEST_OPTS = --root=/path/to/tmpfs > >> > >> TBH, I had never really considered using TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY for this > >> (--root predates it, and was written explicitly for the tmpfs case). But > >> I also think --root is more convenient: > >> > >> - "make test" will run in the tmpfs for speed, but "./t1234-foo.sh -i" > >> will run locally, which makes it easy to "cd" in to inspect the > >> result > >> > >> - likewise, I find accessing the results in t/test-results/*.out a > >> little more convenient > >> > >> But all of that is preference. I don't think you're wrong to use > >> TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY this way, but the above points might be > >> interesting to you. > > > > It is, thanks a lot for the hint. But given your first point about > > direct execution, this in fact makes me want TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY in > > contrast to `--root=/path/to/tmpfs`: especially in the context of perf > > tests, I never run all of them together given that it takes such a long > > time. So I instead either run them directly or via the `./run` script, > > and in both cases I definitely want to have them in tmpfs given that > > there's a lot of disk churn if you're using biggish repos. > > > > Patrick > > Thanks, all. Let me mark the patch for 'next'. OK, if you don't care that TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY is broken, so be it. -- Felipe Contreras