On Mon, Jul 19 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Don't pass the object ID we pass into reflog_expire() back to the >> caller, but rather our locked OID. >> >> As the assert shows these two were the same thing in practice as we'd > > It is unclear which assert you refer to, but a call to verify_lock() > near the end of lock_ref_oid_basic() ensures this, I presume? It's something I omitted by mistake, already fixed in the soon-to-be-sent re-roll, sorry.