Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] merge-ort: add a handle_deferred_entries() helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/13/2021 3:33 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In order to allow trivial directory resolution, we first need to be able
> to gather more information to determine if the optimization is safe.  To
> enable that, we need a way of deferring the recursion into the directory
> until a later time.  Naturally, deferring the entry into a subtree means
> that we need some function that will later recurse into the subdirectory
> exactly the same way that collect_merge_info_callback() would have done.
> 
> Add a helper function that does this.  For now this function is not used
> but a subsequent commit will change that.  Future commits will also make
> the function sometimes resolve directories instead of traversing inside.
...> +MAYBE_UNUSED
> +static int handle_deferred_entries(struct merge_options *opt,
> +				   struct traverse_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct rename_info *renames = &opt->priv->renames;
> +	struct hashmap_iter iter;
> +	struct strmap_entry *entry;
> +	int side, ret = 0;
> +
> +	for (side = MERGE_SIDE1; side <= MERGE_SIDE2; side++) {
> +		renames->trivial_merges_okay[side] = 0;

We are unconditionally setting this to zero? I will await the
use of the method to see how that affects things.

> +		strintmap_for_each_entry(&renames->possible_trivial_merges[side],
> +					 &iter, entry) {

The rest of this loop seems like standard logic for handling
these tree walks.

Thanks,
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux