> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:30:52PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> >
> > Commit 477673d6f3 ("send-pack: support push negotiation", 2021-05-05)
> > did not test the case in which a remote advertises at least one ref. In
> > such a case, "remote_refs" in get_commons_through_negotiation() in
> > send-pack.c would also contain those refs with a zero ref->new_oid (in
> > addition to the refs being pushed with a nonzero ref->new_oid). Passing
> > them as negotiation tips to "git fetch" causes an error, so filter them
> > out.
>
> So here we are filtering those redundant refs on the client side?
Yes, but I don't know what you mean by "redundant".
> > @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ test_expect_success 'push with negotiation' '
> > rm event &&
> > mk_empty testrepo &&
> > git push testrepo $the_first_commit:refs/remotes/origin/first_commit &&
> > + test_commit -C testrepo unrelated_commit &&
>
> So now we are asking 'testrepo' to initially advertise that it also has
> unrelated_commit, which we don't care about, and expect to work fine
> anyway. Ok.
Yes.
> Seems reasonable enough to me.
> Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
