On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 11:08 AM Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Alex Henrie wrote: > > The warning about pulling without specifying how to reconcile divergent > > branches says that after setting pull.rebase to true, --ff-only can > > still be passed on the command line to require a fast-forward. Make that > > actually work. > > I don't know where that is being said, but it's wrong: --ff-only is > meant for merge only. > > > --- a/builtin/pull.c > > +++ b/builtin/pull.c > > @@ -1046,9 +1046,14 @@ int cmd_pull(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > > > can_ff = get_can_ff(&orig_head, &merge_heads.oid[0]); > > > > - if (rebase_unspecified && !opt_ff && !can_ff) { > > - if (opt_verbosity >= 0) > > - show_advice_pull_non_ff(); > > + if (!can_ff) { > > + if (opt_ff) { > > + if (!strcmp(opt_ff, "--ff-only")) > > + die_ff_impossible(); > > As I've mentioned multiple times already, this is wrong. > > The advice clearly says: > > You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase, or --ff-only on the command > line to override the configured default per invocation. > > With your patch now this is even less true: > > git -c pull.ff=only pull --rebase I think it's an improvement over the current situation. --no-rebase does not override pull.ff=only, so it makes sense that --rebase does not override pull.ff=only either. Besides, it's generally better to abort instead of rewriting history if it's not perfectly clear that the user meant to rewrite the history. -Alex