Avishay Matayev <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > If you don't find the approach in this patch good enough, what exactly >> > do you suggest? >> >> Start with not tying this feature with the word "TTY", probably. > Well then, what are other indicators of 'interactivity' besides "TTY"? If we want to force output to always go through the pager, we should call it "force pager", not "force tty". If we want to always show progress bar no matter where the output goes, we should call it "force progress", not "force tty". These should be controllable independenty, even though it is OK to have catch all "force everything" for convenience. There is no inherent reason why the output has to be passed through the pager when it goes to tty. It merely is how we happen to have designed the heuristics. We don't want to carve it in stone and expose it on end-users with a poorly chosen name. Also, we do not want to tie multiple features unnecessarily.
