Martin wrote:
> While writing a mail on the origin topic (improve docs), I noticed that
> the word "branch-ish" is still free.
>
> Which would be anything that resolves to a "branch reference".
>
> Currently this only is
> - branch name.
> - branchname@{upstream}
Actually @ and HEAD too.
I don't particularly see much value in that definition since I always
use a committish when I write a branch name, and the fact that
`git switch` expects branches is one of the things that bothers me about
it.
Either way I don't think it makes much sense to do
`git switch branchnae@{upstream}`, and even less `git switch @`.
--
Felipe Contreras
