Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Change a couple of users of strbuf_init() that pass a hint of 8192 to > pass STRBUF_HINT_SIZE instead. > > Both of these hardcoded occurrences pre-date the use of the strbuf > API. See 5242bcbb638 (Use strbuf API in cache-tree.c, 2007-09-06) and > af6eb82262e (Use strbuf API in apply, blame, commit-tree and diff, > 2007-09-06). > > In both cases the exact choice of 8192 is rather arbitrary, e.g. for > commit buffers I think 1024 or 2048 would probably be a better > default (this commit message is getting this commit close to the > former, but I daresay it's already way above the average for git > commits). Yes, they are arbitrary within the context of these callers. I do not think using STRBUF_HINT_SIZE macro in them is the right thing to do at all, as there is no reason to think that the best value for the write chunk sizes in these codepath has any linkage to the best value for the read chunk sizes used by strbuf_read() at all. When benchmarking reveals that the best default size for strbuf_read() is 16k, you'd update STRBUF_HINT_SIZE to 16k, but how do you tell that it also happens to be the best write buffer size for the cache-tree writeout codepath (answer: you don't)?
